For any exception, the SFO should require the company to notify the FSCO prior to disclosure, to ensure that the SFO is able to consider any potential effects on confidentiality obligations or bias against investigations and potential prosecutions before accepting disclosure. If the court approves the agreement and the draft indictment, the court offices must approve each paper copy of the draft indictment with an indictment and a mention, in order to identify them as a court-approved indictment and the court approval date and to treat the case as suspended by court order.  In making this statement, the prosecutor should require that the investigator, as a rule the lead investigator, provide the prosecutor with a written statement indicating that any document retained by the investigator that may meet the examination set out in the DPA code for disclosure of prosecutions has been brought to the attention of the prosecutor.  Among the typical concepts described in the Dpa code is the company`s agreement: in addition to satisfaction for one of the two members of the evidence test, the prosecutor must be satisfied that the public interest would be adequately fulfilled by the introduction of a Dpa with the company, instead of criminal action.  This requires a balanced exercise of the factors that tend to support prosecutions and those that do not. The factors considered relevant and the weight given to each are within the jurisdiction of the prosecutor and must be decided on a case-by-case basis.  A Dpa has the effect of deferring the prosecution of the offences charged in the indictment. The data protection authority should not include a term that would prevent the company from being prosecuted for conduct not included in the indictment, even if the unassured conduct was disclosed during the DPA negotiations.  Since 1999, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has established guidelines for the continuation of economic organizations and businesses.
 The U.S. Manual of America (USAM) of the DOJ allows for the review of non-prosecution or deferred prosecution of offences committed by companies due to collateral consequences and discusses oral arguments, deferred prosecution agreements and non-prosecution agreements in general.   According to U.S. criminal guidelines, prosecutions postponed in the past are not imputed to the criminal history of an accused if there is no conviction by a court and the accused is not guilty or is otherwise guilty. This contrasts with a deferred provision that generally involves such a finding or authorization.  If the court finds that it is in breach of the data protection authority, it may ask the parties to agree on a proposal for an appropriate remedy. If an agreement can be reached, the parties must ask the Court of Justice for the agreement to be counted as a formal amendment to the CCA.